No matter how you define bitcoin maximalism, there is a noticeable shift in conversation happening about maximalism on Twitter. Some of these are well-known personalities like Max Keiser, Cory Klippsten, Samson Mow, Pierre Rochard and others.Īnd then there are countless “anons” that post memes online, shitpost on Twitter and attack anyone and everything that says something against bitcoin or “shills” altcoins. Then there are toxic maximalists that like to shitpost on Twitter, call all altcoins scams and view themselves as “bitcoin’s immune system”. At least not a problem as big as bitcoin, from a historic and monetary perspective.įrom an investing perspective, bitcoin maximalists might view bitcoin as the only asset they’re comfortable holding since it possesses the best asymmetric risk/reward properties. They don’t believe altcoins solve any significant problem. These maximalists are simply not interested in anything else than bitcoin. They view bitcoin as the only decentralized, commodity-like money that has the ability to separate money and state. There seems to be little consensus about what bitcoin maximalism actually is.įor some, proof-of-work mining combined with the difficulty adjustment and timechains are the true innovation. What appears to be happening on Twitter is a sort of confusion about what bitcoin maximalism is in the first place, and secondly, whether it is dying or growing and thirdly whether it is positive or negative. That would be me (unless Satoshi is still around under another name)Īlso noteworthy, Matt hasn't contributed to Bitcoin Core in quite some time, and his most recent involvement was in the form of sabotage and harming Bitcoin- on Mastodon August 8, 2022
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |